Article 03: The Social Side of Shame - Approach vs Withdrawal
- studying the extent to which shame motivates a preference for social withdrawal versus a preference for social approach
- people experiencing shame to prefered to be together with others (social approach) over being alone (social withdrawal).
- preference for social situations was unique to shame, and not present for guilt
- In the current research, we induced shame and subsequently gave people the choice between being alone or being with others, revealing a preference for either social withdrawal or social approach
Experiment 1:
- independent variable is Shame, Guilt or Control group
- dependent variable is the withdrawal/approach choice
- they ASKED the particpants to write down a personal experience where they felt ashamed. Is this really a good way of getting a participant to feel ashamed omega
Experiment 2:
- participants were organized based on Shame vs Control, and Knowledge of Shamefule Event (yes or no).
- dependent variable is the withdrawal/approach choice
- did a performance test on a computer, and induced shame by publicly revealing their score to the other participants
Results from both experiments were consistent and revealed a preference for the ‘together task’ among those feeling more shame. Shame experiences are associated with a preference for social approach, more than with a preference for social withdrawal
Questions:
- would culture or self-construal have any affect on how people choose to deal with shame
- wouldn’t the testing environment affect responses
- is there a difference between shame and embarassment
- would the shame emotion from Experiment 1 be persistent or last long enough to fill the questionaire?
Limitations:
- Experiment 2 used a performance failure to induce shame, and did not include other types of shame experiences.
- Inconclusive whether results hold for not only shame, but for negative emotions in general.
- The approach in the experiments were relatively neutral tasks.